Supporting T Level industry placement students under the age of 18

These discussions focused on developing a robust policy that supports industry placements, thorough risk assessments, understanding insurance, and considering how language encourages industry placement uptake.
T Level industry placement policies
Robust policies governing T Level industry placements is crucial for encouraging buy-in from colleagues across the organisation. For some organisations this may be the first time that a policy explicitly supports students on industry placement detailing the processes that need to be followed. Some organisations choose to integrate an industry placement into their work experience policy, whereas for others they are standalone. We spoke to Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals Trust (BHRUT) and Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation trust (SPFT) about what their policies contained to support T Level learners.
Insurance for young learners
Employers are advised to consult their legal teams regarding Employer’s Liability Insurance and Public Liability Insurance when planning T Level industry placements. The example below reflects one employer’s experience and does not constitute legal advice.
Government guidance states that no further cover is needed for T Level students. However, for placements over two weeks, insurers will need to be notified though this is likely to be on an aggregate basis and not for each individual learner. The Association of British insurers has further relevant information to support employers.
At Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Foundation Trust an incorrect assumption about public liability insurance, specifically the assumption that it excluded individuals under 18, initially prevented under-18s from being considered for placements. The wording of the insurance referred to a ‘relevant person’ which was interpreted as an adult of over 18.
Realising that this would be a barrier to developing a T Level industry placement strategy, as well as having implications for apprenticeships and work experience, the apprenticeship manager sought clarification. They approached the legal services team, who in turn asked NHS Resolution, the trust’s indemnifier, for clarity on whether a ‘relevant person’ was linked to an individual over a certain age. NHS Resolution confirmed that the age of the ‘relevant person’ has no bearing on the indemnity offered, resolving a long-held misconception.
The outcome of this conversation was shared with the Nursing Workforce Strategy Group meeting, chaired by the deputy director of nursing who were reassured that due diligence had been done. With a supporting risk assessment strategy, the trust was able to consider a pilot of industry placements.
Do students need a DBS
A DBS check is very likely to be required for students on a T Level industry placement in the health and care sector. Some providers may require students to do a DBS check as part of entry onto the T Level course, whilst others may organise this at point of industry placement.
Line managers and supervisors will not generally require a DBS check; however, some providers might ask that this is done for when they are hosting industry placement students. For more information, view the NHS Employers DBS check eligibility tool and the GOV.UK T Levels web section.
Reframing the language used to support young learners
During the introduction of the new work experience policy at BHRUT, it became apparent that there was significantly more buy-in to offer opportunities to students who were over 18. This has been, in part, addressed by the focus on localised risk assessments contained within the new policy but there was still some concern from areas.
The Early Careers Team realised that to encourage departments within the trust to offer placements to students under 18, they needed to reframe the language used. They operated on the principle that age does not define ability in education programmes. Therefore, building from positive examples such as undergraduate nursing students referred to by year group, to reframe language in this way.
They concluded that referring to year groups was a sensible way to classify the tasks that T Level students might undertake during their placement. The team engaged with colleagues to encourage them to move away from the under-18 or over 18-distinctions. By referring to the students’ year group, namely year 12 or year 13, departments could more easily decide which tasks and areas in departments might be suitable. For example, with T Level students working with urgent care, suitable placements were identified within Accident and Emergency such as triage. This is only available to T-Level students in year 13 who have completed their year 12 placements as they have developed knowledge and experience to meet the demands of the setting.
Collaborating to support industry placements for under 18s
Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (CPFT) and Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust (RCHT) have collaborated to develop a shared T Level industry placement programme where first year students, who are all under 18, can observe several different areas to inform their future career plans. This series of observational placements equips them with a solid understanding on which to specialise in their second year.
Key takeaways for employers
- Ensure that T Level industry placements are referred to in relevant trust policies and give explicit assurances to areas looking at hosting students.
- Speak to organisational legal teams to understand the process on informing insurance providers.
- Re-frame the conversation from over-18 or under-18 to year groups, focusing on what would be suitable for Year 12 students and Year 13 students.
- Allow for flexibility and work in partnership with colleagues to identify suitable areas and risk assess for students in different year groups, it may be worth developing different placement models for first year and second year students.
- It’s suggested that all placements include both a standard and localised health and safety induction with a focus on area-specific risks.